And surprisingly enough, I really like wearing this dress. Is it the most flattering garment in my closet? Probably not. Will I be abandoning all of my dresses with fitted waists? No way.
Thursday, December 31, 2015
So this was fun!
And I have to admit that it feels bizarre to have a bunch of loose fabric around my waist, but the experience was not unpleasant. It was actually quite fun to make and wear something so far out of my comfort zone.
The pleats are what initially drew me to the pattern, and they are, without a doubt, my favorite design element.
I did add 3/4" to the torso length so this slightly longer than the original, but if it was much longer, I think the dress would be quite difficult to wear.
The pegged hem also helps to keep the shape interesting.
So will I make another? I am probably finished with this particular pattern, but I am definitely going to take a second look at garments with little to no waist definition. And I would call that a successful experiment!
Dress: Made by me, BurdaStyle 109b
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
Lately, I find myself drawn more and more to these odd sack-like silhouettes from the 1950s and 60s.
But as excited as I am about this pattern, I had serious misgivings that I would love the finished dress. After all, how many hours of my time do I want to spend working away on something that I am not going to like in the end? Then again, how am I going to know if I like the look until I finish the darn thing.
Do you have to be shaped like Audrey Hepburn to pull this off? Some of these dresses are so shapeless, I am beginning to think that a waif-like frame is not required.
But I still feel as though this sort of silhouette is going to look best on someone six feet tall and very thin.
Is this Balenciaga frock inspired by a Miró painting flattering to the female form? Probably not . . . but it sure is stunning. And if the garment does not even attempt to flatter the body does that, in fact, make it easier to wear?
It seems like all you really need to wear a sack dress is some confidence.
Should clothing styles be flattering? And what the heck defines something as flattering? What do you think?
[Click on image for source]
Monday, December 21, 2015
I decided to try something a bit different for my latest sewing project. I noticed this pattern on Burda's website a few weeks back - not something I would normally be drawn to, but the design stuck in my mind for days.
The problem was, I could not find the pattern on the site when I went to purchase the pattern.I searched "pleated back dress" to no avail.
Well, silly me, this is a “Gathered Back Dress.”
Say what?! Is this some weird translation issue? Because there is no gathering in this entire garment. Well, I suppose I used an ease stitch to set my sleeve in place . . . but other than than, no gathering whatsoever. I think they need some help naming their patterns over at BurdaStyle!
For my underlining, I used black organza. Because of the dark wool fabric, I thought it might be easier to see white chalk lines when the two were layered together. It worked great!
Next came a lot of hand basting.
I have had some back luck with printed designs being slightly off grain, so this woven pattern was a nice change. It is really nice having a constant reminder of the grainline built right into the fabric!
Having worked with a similar fabric for this project, I can say that the underlining was useful for more than just marking my stitching lines. The back of the wool is easily pulled by my standard presser foot when two layers of fabric are run through the machine. With the organza covering the loose threads, that problem was resolved.
The only real construction challenge was what to do about those pleats. The arrows on the pattern suggest that they be folded toward center back. This is not possible with the way the two center pleats are drafted, so I looked at the online version (the directions are no help). Turns out, they should be folded towards the side seam – which works so much better!
I debated removing the pockets because this dress is rather sack-like, and I did not want added bulk in the front half of the dress.
But since I was catch-stitching seam allowances in place, I figured I could just as easily catch-stitch the pockets to stay nice and flat.
Although not called for in the directions, I added a lining. Two of the pleats were removed by folding out the excess ease at the neckline, being careful to leave enough room through the hips as the silhouette narrows.
I suppose I could have redrafted the top to remove those pleats completely, but the bemberg rayon is lightweight, so any added bulk is really not that much of an issue.
I added some width to the neck facing and finished the raw edge with rayon seam binding.
The facing was under-stitched by hand, and the sleeve lining stitched into place.
And because of the extreme pegged hem, I made a facing for the skirt hem.
The only thing left to do is to make a couple of thread chains to anchor the lining to the hem facing and check for any stray basting threads!
Monday, December 7, 2015
This summer, I knew I would be attending the High Style exhibit at the Legion of Honor.
I have been meaning to make a version of Vogue 8276 for years, and this was just the push I needed. Of course, I was temped to make a whole new outfit for the occasion, but that is just silly when I have so many dresses that deserve a day out.
In June of 2014 I managed to finish this dress for a symphony event, but there was just not enough time to make a hat. So the pattern was put away . . . again.
Without a specific event, it seemed silly to make such a head covering. (This style of hat is a little too much for a day at work, even for me!)
It is perfect, however, for an afternoon at a museum.
Although, a windy day in San Francisco does make for an interesting hat wearing experience!
Dress: Made by me, McCall 9245
Hat: Made by me, Vogue 8276
Necklace, Earrings, & Bracelet: Made by me
Gloves: VintageShoes: Franco Sarto