Aargh!  The Vintage
Vogue pattern line is going downhill, fast.  I can sum up the new designs in one word:  boring.
|  | 
| Vogue 9000 | 
Don’t get me wrong, this is a cute dress.  But such a basic design is easy to find
in any modern pattern catalog.  If you
are bothering to reproduce something vintage, it should be spectacular (in my opinion).  And as much as I love the styles of the 1950s, would it be possible to get a little variety every once in a while?
| .jpg) | 
| Vogue 9000 | 
And then there is Vogue 8999.  What the heck were they thinking?!  This has got to be one of the most
unflattering examples of a Vintage Vogue pattern I have ever seen.  Let Molly Ringwald cut this thing up, and leave that adorable pink polka dot vintage piece alone!  Pretty in pink this is NOT!  
|  | 
| Vogue 8999 | 
The illustrator got so bored they did not even bother to put
any color on their sketch!  But, to be fair, that bolero looks pretty cute.  
| .jpg) | 
| Vogue 8999 | 
Most of the time I eagerly anticipate picking up the new
patterns as soon as they go on sale, but I am certainly not going to rush out to buy any of these.  There are a few of the modern designs that interest me, but for now I think I will hold off. 
| .jpg) | 
| Vogue 8991 | 
The Shaeffer jacket, for instance, is not my style, but I may have to peek inside at the directions to see if they are worth the price of purchase.  Couture details are something that I can get behind!  So where are the couture vintage pattern reproductions?!  I thought Vogue was for the advanced sewer - please leave the basic reproductions for the Butterick line.
 
 














































