My boss and I have frequent arguments discussions about the
definition of Art. He believes that a
painted piece of wood is Art, and I disagree.
This is the same person who frequents museums on a very regular basis,
but will avoid the Balenciaga and Yves St. Laurent exhibits right down the hall
because he can’t be bothered. Well, I
certainly think that a gown that required hundreds and hundreds of hours of
work by skilled artisans deserves of spot in a museum (and deserves to be worn
as well!).
So what makes a piece of Art worthy of a museum?
Webster defines Art as “the quality, production, expression,
or realm of what is beautiful or of more than ordinary significance.” How exactly did a splash of paint or some
kind of ink scrawl become classified as “Art” and why are some people willing
to pay thousands and thousands of dollars for something that looks like a small
child could easily create and seems, to me, to be the definition of ordinary?
So when my boss first mentioned an artist that painted
planks of wood and had a successful career, I was skeptical, and then rather
infuriated. If this is art, then every
house painter out there deserves to be in a museum, right? How is his creation any more special than a stick
that a small child took a paint brush to?
As you may have guessed, I am not a huge fan of modern
art. What I find amusing is that the
clothing and silhouettes I gravitate toward were most likely inspired by this
very work. But hey, at least I can see
the hypocrisy, right?
I adore Elsa Schiaparelli, but have a hard time with
Salvador Dali – ridiculous, I know, but since when does personal taste follow
any sort of logic?!
That being said, I can certainly appreciate the skill
involved in some of the art created in the last century. And I love when clothing designers like Yves St.
Laurent are inspired by a flat canvas created by Mondrian and make a woman’s
curved shape into a canvas of shape, color, and blank space. Brilliant!
With my recent introduction to John McCracken (he of the
painted plank) fresh in my mind, I came across the
Sew Weekly’s “Inspired by
Art” Challenge. I happened to have a bright pink wool/silk
blend fabric that has been calling out to me.
Add to that a recent ebay purchase of this pattern, and I knew exactly
what I wanted to make up.
This dress is really very simple in construction. The thing that makes it interesting for me it
the pleating on the front of the skirt and, of course, the bow!
Kimono sleeves are fabulous, but I am always nervous
clipping the seams. I came across a
little trick in the instructions for
this dress years ago and have found it
really helps: topstitching on either
side of the curved seam for a couple of inches directly over where you have
clipped will keep those cuts from migrating into and beyond the seam. I generally machine stitch this technique,
but this time around I decided to hand back-stitch for added control.
Speaking of hand stitching, I am really becoming obsessed
with lapped zippers. And although the
fabric might not have needed it, I added a strip of organza to stabilize the
zipper – I think it also helps keep the seam from pulling the loose weave open
during wear.
Of course, halfway through the project I was convinced that
the fabric was NOT working for the silhouette.
Imagine the body of silk organza with the added thickness of wool. It really is fantastic stuff (and another one
of my
Fashion Fabrics Club purchases that was an unexpected color – I really
wonder who is taking those photos!) but I was afraid that I was going to look
like giant pink balloon. This dress can
stand up on its own without a dress form or body to hold it up!
Now that the dress is complete, it really looks more Mad Men
than plank to me, and perhaps that is a good thing. Joan, in particular, can’t seem to get enough
of bright pink. And if it’s good enough
for her, it's certainly good enough for me!
Enough of my rant - and perhaps that is the true purpose of Art - to spark discussion and thought.
Coat: Benard Holtzman
Shoes: Nine West
“Vishnu”
Belt: Thrifted
Fishnets: Ralph
Lauren
Earrings: Vintage
Ring: Macys
